It’s frustrating that pharmaceutical companies do not test vaccines using the standard scientific method they use in other drug testing. When they are testing new drugs, they have a group who get the drug and compare them to a placebo group (people who are not receiving the drug–but only a “sugar” pill). In this way, any side effects of the drug can be readily seen. With vaccines they instead use a practice that is pseudo science. They give a group of children the new vaccine but then compare this group of children to another group of children who have been vaccinated with a different vaccine not a placebo! They are comparing vaccinated children with vaccinated children! Then, they look for any differences in vaccine side-effects. This approach minimizes issues since both groups suffer the same types of problems and nothing stands out by way of comparison.

This sneaky, unscientific way to “test” vaccine safety only serves to lull the public into a false sense of vaccine security. This “placebo” group is not a true placebo group. Placebos groups are supposed to have nothing done to them (they take a sugar pill which causes no biological effect). These shenanigans allow the vaccine manufacturer to avoid problems with their testing. Since they are comparing a new vaccine with an old vaccine, problems will be minimized. Both groups will experience side effects due to vaccinations so other problems associated only with the new vaccine will be less dramatic than if they compared it to children who never had a vaccine at all. Because of this shady approach to science, very little real science exists comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children.

In 2017, one study was finally published that addressed this topic for the first time. It was titled “The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment.” Researchers reported the data for children who had been vaccinated with the DTP vaccine “was associated with a 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP…DTP is the most widely used vaccine…All currently available evidence suggest that DTP vaccine may killĀ  more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus, or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease, it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.”

The last sentence refers to a concept called NSEs (nonspecific effects) of vaccines. It is a scientific way of saying vaccines can make a child more susceptible to other infections. Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych in her book, Vaccine Illusion: How Vaccination Compromises Our Natural Immunity and What We Can Do to Regain Our Health stated, “despite the fact that the biological basis of naturally acquired immunity is not understood, present day medical practices insist upon artificialĀ  manipulation of the immune response (a.k.a. immunization or vaccination) to secure “immunity” without going through the actual disease process. The vaccine-induced process, although not resembling a natural disease, is nevertheless still a disease process with its own risks. And it is not immunity that we gain via vaccination but a puny surrogate of immunity. For this reason, vaccination at its core is neither a safe nor an effective method of disease prevention.”

J.B. Handley, in his book How to End the Autism Epidemic, states, “What we learn from the African study, and that is perfectly explained by Dr. Obukhanych, is that children going through the artificial disease process triggered by a vaccine are actually more susceptible to suffer (and sometimes die) from other diseases, because their immune system is weakened and compromised in ways we really don’t yet understand.”

For more information on problems with vaccinations, see my book, There’s An Elephant in the Room–Exposing Hidden Truths in the Science of Health.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Participants Log In